Tang DMi top version contrast CR-V sharp mixed net speed version

　　Two of the most mainstream hybrid SUVs, let’s take a look at the fuel consumption that everyone is most concerned about. There are two kinds of fuel consumption declared by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of Honda Sharp CR-V Hybrid Net Speed Edition, the NEDC comprehensive working condition is 4.9 liters, and the Tang DMi is 1.2L. In addition, Tang DMi also has a power loss and fuel consumption of 5.5L

　　In the actual test drive evaluation, when the speed of 0-80 is below 100 km/h at most, the DONG DMi Zunrong model has always been in the most fuel-efficient range, with an average fuel consumption of about 3.5L At this time, it is mainly driven by the motor, and the engine is only responsible for charging the motor, and it continues to operate in a high-efficiency area, so the fuel consumption is very low. Moreover, Tang DMi also has a pure battery life of 112 kilometers. At this time, the fuel consumption is 0. The engine is not working. Therefore, Tang DMi is very suitable for driving at a speed of about 30 kilometers per hour on urban congested roads. The more blocked, the more fuel-efficient it is, which is worthy of the name.

　　Similarly, when the speed of 0-80 is below 100 km/h at most, the Honda CR-V sharp hybrid net speed version is also the most fuel-efficient range. However, it is not 100% motor-driven like I when starting, but the motor directly drives the engine to start running together, even if the full charge is sufficient. Therefore, its comprehensive fuel consumption in Bitang DMi is slightly higher. When it is below 100 kilometers, it is usually measured at around 6L.

　　Then, at the speed of 100-140 kilometers per hour, the fuel consumption of both cars has increased a lot. When the average speed of Tang DMi is 130, the highest measured fuel consumption of both cars exceeds 9L-10L. It can be said that there is no difference between high-speed industrial and mining hybrid and ordinary self-priming fuel consumption.

　　Let’s look at the following chassis. The suspensions of both cars are very good, flexible and comfortable to drive. If we must say something bad, the tire noise is a bit loud when the speed exceeds 130 per hour. In addition, Tang DMi chassis protective guard plate is larger than Cr-V.

　　Finally, neither car has a spare tire, and the CR-V comes with an air pump and a tire repair tank. Don DMi does have a tire tonic. Because the battery is under the trunk of the hybrid model. There is no room for sinking.

　　The interior atmosphere and materials are basically dominated by Tang DMi. In particular, the buttons on the CR-V steering wheel feel cheap, the multimedia screen is small and the switching speed is slow. Of course, there are also comments that BYD is slow, but the one we tested is ok.

　　Well, after comparison, it is found that Tang DMi and CR-V sharp hybrid net speed version are evenly matched, with better space and interior, almost equal power and fuel consumption, and Tang has a slight advantage. However, Tang DMi has just been listed, and its stability and reliability need to be tested for a long time. CR-V sharp hybrid has been well-known in the market for nearly five years. In addition, Tang DMi has two-wheel drive systems, and CR-V sharp hybrid has four-wheel drive systems. If there are only short-distance urban scenes, you may wish to try Tang DMi. If there is still off-road demand, please consider CR-V sharp hybrid four-wheel drive systems, or Tang DM.

　　Welcome to leave a message to support the one-click attention of engineering women.

　　Looking back at the space and power comparison between the two cars, please see the first episode: Who is better for home hybrid SUV? Tang DMi top version contrast CR-V sharp mixed net speed version